Talk:The Mama Who Came to Dinner

The Mama Who Came to Dinner has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 22, 2021. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Mama Who Came to Dinner article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Mama Who Came to Dinner/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Soaper1234 (talk · contribs) 13:56, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I plan on reviewing this article. It is my first GA review, so do bear with me. Expect comments in the coming days. Soaper1234 - talk 13:56, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have responded to all your comments, so I am happy to give this article a pass. Well done! Soaper1234 - talk 14:11, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

All looks fine to me.

Synopsis

The plot section passes MOS:TVPLOT.

Production

Do you have a source for the director, writers and producers?

Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:31, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clarify who Judy Winslow is as she has not been mentioned anywhere so far.

Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:31, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

Are the years for the different shows necessary?

Done Removed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:31, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unlink Family Matters

Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:31, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove "("What a Wonderful World" by Louis Armstrong)" - second mention of theme song so no need to clarify.

Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:31, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"and to turn off their TVs after the song concluded" → "and then turn their television off".

Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:31, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

Change |author= in references to |first= |last=.

Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:31, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reference #4 still needs changing. This can be done using |first1= |last1= |first2= |last2=. Soaper1234 - talk 10:10, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Soaper1234: The issue has been fixed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:28, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Notes

@Soaper1234: All Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:31, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]